Hyperliquid Revenue and HYPE Buybacks
What Hyperliquid earns in trading fees each day and how much HYPE the Assistance Fund buys with them, from HyperCore fills and balances.
HyperliquidWhich crypto protocols spend the most on token buybacks, and how much of their supply have they bought?
Which protocols spend the most buying back or burning their own tokens, what pays for it and what share of supply the purchases remove.
The table as it will open in Strata. Each figure is named here and arrives with its receipt; until its data is published, its place stays empty.
One row One row per protocol per token, over the last 30 and 365 daysSorted by Spent, 365 days, highest first
| Protocol | Token | Chain | Method | Funded by | Spent, 30 daysUSD | Spent, 365 daysUSD | Tokens bought, 365 daystokens | Burned, 365 daystokens | Share of supply bought | Receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Filter by Chain, Method, Funded by.
A token buyback is a protocol using its revenue to buy its own token on the market, then holding, burning or distributing what it bought. This table ranks protocols by how much they spend on buybacks, measured from the purchases themselves: the swaps and order-book fills made by each protocol's published buyback addresses.
Beside the amount spent, each row shows the tokens bought, how many were burned and what share of the token's supply the buybacks removed over the period. Supply share is the fairer comparison, since a small protocol can retire more of its token than a large one that spends more.
Every amount is cited to its transactions, so a reader can open the fills behind any row. A buyback that a protocol announces but that does not appear on-chain is not counted until it does.
Every figure will be read at a block, kept with its source and its exact read, and open a receipt anyone can re-check.
How receipts work →Read from chain state and history
A protocol spends revenue or treasury funds to buy its own token on the open market. It may then burn the tokens, hold them in a treasury or pass them to stakers. The effect on supply depends on which of those it does.
Several protocols fund buybacks from their fees, among them Hyperliquid through its Assistance Fund and pump.fun with a share of its revenue. The table lists every protocol whose buyback addresses are in the registry, ranked by the spend found on-chain.
No. A burn removes tokens from supply for good; a buyback only moves tokens from the market to the protocol. Bought tokens can be burned, held, distributed or later sold, so the table shows bought and burned amounts separately.
Real yield usually means returns paid from a protocol's actual revenue rather than from new token issuance. Buybacks are one way to pass revenue to token holders, and the protocol revenue ranking shows the revenue side.
Spend favors large protocols. Share of supply shows how much of the token a buyback actually takes off the market, which is what matters for a holder's stake.
What Hyperliquid earns in trading fees each day and how much HYPE the Assistance Fund buys with them, from HyperCore fills and balances.
HyperliquidA dated monthly league table of token buybacks and burns: who spent the most, what share of supply it removed and how it was paid for.
Multi-chainHyperliquidSolana+2How much of pump.fun's revenue goes into buying PUMP each day, how much PUMP has been bought and how much of it was burned.
SolanaUNI burned since the Uniswap fee switch went live, the protocol fees that pay for each burn and the UNI supply left after them.
EthereumUnichainDeFi protocols ranked by the fees their users pay and the revenue they keep, over 24 hours, 30 days and a year, with each one's take rate.
Multi-chainEthereumBase+3Live and recent on-chain DAO proposals: votes cast, quorum progress, voting power and whether each passed and was executed.
Multi-chainEthereumArbitrum+1Start free in Voltfin Studio: boards, tables and reports where every number opens its receipt. Tell us which data you need first and we will build it next.