DAO Governance Tracker: On-Chain Proposals and Votes
Live and recent on-chain DAO proposals: votes cast, quorum progress, voting power and whether each passed and was executed.
Multi-chainEthereumArbitrum+1Which DAOs have the highest and lowest voter turnout?
DAOs ranked by how much of their delegated voting power votes on on-chain proposals, with quorum hit rates and voter concentration.
The table as it will open in Strata. Each figure is named here and arrives with its receipt; until its data is published, its place stays empty.
One row One row per DAO governor, over its on-chain proposals in the last 90 daysSorted by Turnout of delegated votes, highest first
| DAO | Chain | Proposals, 90 dayscount | Turnout of delegated votes | Turnout of supply | Supply delegated | Reached quorum | Voters per proposalcount | Top 10 voters' share | Receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Filter by Chain.
Voter turnout in a DAO is the share of voting power that takes part in a vote. This table ranks DAOs by it over the on-chain proposals of the last 90 days: the median share of delegated voting power cast per proposal, how often proposals reached quorum and how many addresses voted.
Turnout is measured against delegated voting power rather than total supply, because tokens that were never delegated cannot vote in most governors. Both measures are shown, so a DAO with little delegation can be told apart from one whose delegates stay away.
Each row also shows how concentrated the votes are: the share cast by the ten largest voters. High turnout driven by a few large delegates reads differently from broad participation.
Every figure will be read at a block, kept with its source and its exact read, and open a receipt anyone can re-check.
How receipts work →Read from chain state and history
There is no single benchmark. Turnout depends on how much supply is delegated, how many proposals a DAO holds and how its quorum is set. The table shows each DAO's turnout beside its quorum hit rate, which shows whether participation is enough for its own rules.
Voting costs attention and sometimes gas, many holders keep tokens on exchanges or in DeFi where they cannot vote and small holders see little effect from their vote. Delegation was designed for this, letting active delegates vote on holders' behalf.
In governors built on ERC20Votes, tokens count toward votes only after their holder delegates them, to themselves or to another address. Delegated voting power is the total assigned that way at a given block.
No. This table covers on-chain governor votes, which can be read and receipted from the chain. Off-chain signalling votes are not recorded on a chain.
Live and recent on-chain DAO proposals: votes cast, quorum progress, voting power and whether each passed and was executed.
Multi-chainEthereumArbitrum+1DAO treasuries ranked by on-chain holdings, split into each DAO's own token, stablecoins and other assets, with unpriced tokens flagged.
Multi-chainEthereumArbitrum+2Proxy admins, owners and multisig thresholds for each major protocol, with the timelock that stands between a change and its execution.
Multi-chainEthereumArbitrum+2Which protocols spend the most buying back or burning their own tokens, what pays for it and what share of supply the purchases remove.
Multi-chainHyperliquidSolana+4DeFi protocols ranked by the fees their users pay and the revenue they keep, over 24 hours, 30 days and a year, with each one's take rate.
Multi-chainEthereumBase+3A dated monthly league table of token buybacks and burns: who spent the most, what share of supply it removed and how it was paid for.
Multi-chainHyperliquidSolana+2Start free in Voltfin Studio: boards, tables and reports where every number opens its receipt. Tell us which data you need first and we will build it next.